STATES OF JERSEY
r
Relocation of Jersey Dairy: investigation into alternative sites
Lodged au Greffe on 15th January 2007
by Deputy J.B. Fox of St. Helier
STATES GREFFE
PROPOSITION
THE STATES
are asked to decide whether they are of opinion -
to
agree that a full investigation of all possible alternative sites for the
relocation of the Jersey Dairy should be undertaken by the Minister for
Treasury and Resources, in consultation with other Ministers as necessary, and
that the results of the investigation setting out the advantages and
disadvantages of all possible alternative options should be presented to the
States prior to the consideration of the Draft Howard Davis Farm (Partial
Abrogation of Covenant) (Jersey) Law 200- (P.170/2006).
DEPUTY J.B. FOX OF ST. HELIER
REPORT
A covenant gifted to the Island, whether to the States
or other organisations such as the National Trust, is often ‘willed’ with a
covenant for a specific purpose as in this case, and should only be altered,
partially abrogated or removed as a last resort. In this case Proposition
P.170/2006 is silent on any suitable alternative site investigations.
The States on a number of occasions in the past have
partially abrogated an existing covenant to allow an alternative use. This practice
has only been possible after full details have been considered by the States
resulting in an Act of the States and a change in the law.
When a generous benefactor such as T.B. Davis
wills a gift of this magnitude in memory of his son Howard, who served with
distinction and died in service for his country, and the freedom of future
generations, then I believe that the States when considering any abrogation,
partial or otherwise, whether with the consent of the living heirs of
T.B. Davis should only be considered when all other alternative options
have been exhausted.
The Dairy Industry in Jersey, the Strategic Review,
prepared for the Economic Development Committee by Donald McQueen MA PhD ARSGS
dated February 2003; the PROMAR International Final Report, A Sustainable Dairy
Industry in Jersey, dated December 2006 and this States of Jersey, P.170/2006
Proposition, Draft Howard Davis Farm (Partial Abrogation of Covenant) (Jersey)
Law 200- lodged au Greffe on 21st December 2006, by the Minister for Treasury
and Resources, describe the good reasons why there is a necessity to move and
build a new commercial dairy and milk processing facility, of approximately
26,500 square feet together with ancillary offices, storage, vehicle parking
and access road.
There is no explanation of any investigation in any of
the three reports, as to why a more appropriate alternative site has not been
identified which would alleviate the necessity of having to consider building a
large commercial structure on green agricultural land resulting in the partial
abrogation of an existing covenant.
Nowhere in the reports does it detail a full
investigation of all possible alternative sites for the relocation of the
Jersey Dairy or give any conclusions including the reasons for the rejection of
any alternative options, and therefore I submit this proposition and ask that
the States consider this prior to consideration of the Draft Howard Davis Farm
(Partial Abrogation of Covenant) (Jersey) Law 200-. My principle concern is
that future benefactors may be dissuaded from gifting land if they perceive
that the States Assembly may, in the future, disregard their original
intentions.
Financial
and manpower implications
There are no financial or manpower implications for
the States arising from this proposition apart from the actual costs of the
investigation and I believe these can be met within existing resources.