r
Goods and Services Tax: exemption or zero-rating for foodstuffs and domestic energy (P.103/2008) – second amendment
Lodged au Greffe on 3rd September 2008
by Deputy
S. Pitman of St. Helier
STATES GREFFE
GOODS AND SERVICES TAX: EXEMPTION OR ZERO-RATING FOR FOODSTUFFS AND DOMESTIC ENERGY (P.103/2008) – SECOND AMENDMENT
After sub-paragraph (ii) insert the following new sub-paragraph –
(*) school uniforms.
DEPUTY S. PITMAN OF ST. HELIER
REPORT
Even in bringing my proposition to exempt the very basis of healthy foodstuffs, i.e. vegetables, fruit and milk, I make no apologies for stating that it was still to be very much a poor second, as we in the Jersey Democratic Alliance (JDA) have consistently stressed since even before the 2005 election – there should be no GST on food at all! More than this, there should be no GST full stop! Not only is this a regressive and socially divisive tax – we simply do not need it, as Deputy Southern has provided the figures to demonstrate this.
As such, whilst I will be supporting the Deputy of Grouville’s proposition and the amendments brought by Senator Norman, until such time that this Assembly can finally bring itself to acknowledge the error of its judgement and rescind GST altogether, I feel that given the belated recognition of the heavy impact of ever-spiralling costs on the income of ordinary working people, we now have the opportunity to go one step further.
School
Uniforms
As I have outlined at length in my own proposition P.104/2008 (exempting GST on fruit, vegetables and milk) just as the States preach the necessity of Jersey people ensuring they, and more importantly, their children, consume the much-heralded ‘five portions a day’ of vegetables and fruit, yet with GST on food makes the affordance of this even more difficult, much can be said regarding the issue of school uniforms.
We, the States of Jersey, demand of parents that their children comply with school regulations’ dress codes. Yet here, once again, we simultaneously place further strain on their pockets by taxing them for complying with our very demands.
Let it be fully acknowledged that this is no small taxation to many parents; I hope the figures (see Appendix) on the cost of school uniforms for 5 – 6 year-old children, will give Members a rough idea as to how much impact GST has on the expense of buying school uniforms.
As such, and bearing in mind that the Minister for Treasury and Resources has recently announced that GST will now raise £5 to £10 million more than was originally envisaged, I call on Members to acknowledge that such taxation on apparel is wholly unjust and support the amendment.
Financial and
manpower costs
As to the loss of tax revenue from GST to the States: I foresee that if this exemption is successful, the loss will be relatively very small. If one considers the estimated loss of GST charged on foodstuffs as being £2.9 million (information provided by the Treasury to Deputy Labey for her proposition: P.103/2008); the fact that food is bought much more frequently than school uniforms; that a large proportion of Islanders do not have children attending school; and that the majority of them do not attend school themselves; I make the assertion that the GST lost on school uniforms will be considerably less than that lost on food.
As to the States recovering these costs, may I suggest that –
· The Treasury legislate for the additions of GST on: the building of conservatories and swimming pool maintenance.
· The negotiation between the Treasury and 1(1)(k) residents (900 – 1,000) should cease and their proportion of tax should become equal in real terms, to that of all taxpaying citizens in Jersey.
· Finally, I would like Members to also bear in mind when considering whether or not they should vote for this proposition, the words of Senator Shenton in his proposition of 26th October 2007 (GST: Zero-rating for Foodstuffs, Books, Newspapers and Magazines): ‘remember a forecast deficit of £3 million has, in fact, turned into a £38 million surplus! Do not rely too much on figures produced by a Department with such a poor forecasting record. What happens if we produce £41 million more than expected again next year?’
Anyone of these options for the Treasury to gain lost tax revenue, would, I am sure, cover the additional administrative costs of exempting GST on school uniforms.
APPENDIX
Primary school uniform costs –
based on one primary school for children
aged 5 – 6
GIRL:
|
Winter |
|
|
Sports kit (Can only buy from one shop for this particular
school’s kit). |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blouses |
£3.50 |
x2 |
Shorts |
£5.00 |
x2 |
|
Pinafore |
£10.00 |
x2 |
T-Shirt |
£5.00 |
x2 |
|
Skirt |
£5.00 |
x2 |
Bag |
£4.00 |
x1 |
|
Cardigan |
£6.50 |
x2 |
Plimsolls |
£4.00 |
x1
or 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summer |
|
|
TOTAL: £160.00 (Includes – x2 shoes at £30.00 and x2 plimsolls). |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dress |
£7.00 |
x2 |
PLUS 3% GST on each item |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tie |
£4.00 |
x1 |
|
|
|
|
Shoes |
£30 – £40.00 |
x1
or 2 |
|
|
|
(This does not include a coat, tights, socks – these items of clothing can be construed as not necessarily unique to wear for school. One should also consider that other necessities for school, such as a reading folder, lunch box, etc., are not taken into account here.)
_______________________________________________________________
BOY:
|
Winter |
|
|
Sports kit (Can only buy from one shop for this particular
school’s kit). |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shirts |
£3.50 |
x2 |
Shorts |
£5.00 |
x2 |
|
Trousers |
£4.00 |
x2 |
T-Shirt |
£5.00 |
x2 |
|
Jumpers |
£9.00 |
x2 |
Bag |
£4.00 |
x1 |
|
|
|
|
Plimsolls |
£4.00 |
x1
or 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summer |
|
|
TOTAL: £151.00 (Includes – x2 shoes at £30.00 and x2 plimsolls). |
||
|
Shorts |
| ||||