STATES OF JERSEY
r
Island Plan 2002: H4 Site No. 15, Samarès Nursery, St. Clement and future amendments to the Island Plan (P.95/2007): comments
Presented to the States on 23rd October 2007
by the Minister for Planning and Environment
STATES GREFFE
COMMENTS
The proposition falls into two distinct parts, one
relating to a specific site earmarked in the 2002 Island Plan and the other to
procedural matters for approval of future Island Plans in relation to the legal
requirements of the Planning and Building (Jersey) Law 2002, as amended.
My comments are as follows –
Samarès
Nurseries
It is my view that a one-off proposition of this
nature is not the appropriate way to consider this matter. As Members will
know, I have commenced the review of the Island Plan 2002, which will
incorporate an updated review of housing needs and will review the suitability
all of the H3 and H4 sites which have not already come forward for development.
I feel it would be better to make a decision on specific sites within the context
of the Island Plan Review.
However, I can assure the Deputy that I will not bring
any proposition or recommendation to the States regarding the designation of
Samarès Nurseries for development, nor will my Department consider or determine
any planning application, in advance of the States debating the Reviewed Island
Plan Document.
Amendment to
the Planning and Building (Jersey) Law 2002
Article 3 of the Law prevents Members of the States
bringing propositions, or amendments to any proposition of the Minister, to
adopt or modify the Island Plan, because it provides only for the Minister to
present the Plan or revisions to the States.
The Article also requires any such proposal to be
publicised and the opportunity given to the public to make representations, and
for those representations to be heard in public. Were the Law to change to
allow Members to bring direct propositions to amend the Island Plan, it would,
I believe, be essential for there to be such consultation before it could be
debated. There have, for example, been occasions in the past where propositions
have been brought by Members regarding the designation of sites, without even
consulting the owners.
However, I support the principle of the Deputy’s
amendment. The Law requires me to make an Order prescribing how my proposals
shall be publicised and how representations from members of the public should
be made and heard. My department is currently working on a law drafting brief
for the Order dealing with public involvement in the Island Plan Review in
2008. It may be possible to deal with Deputy Gorst’s proposal in this Order and
I will seek legal advice on this point. In the event that it cannot be dealt
with in this way, I will bring a proposition to amend the Planning and Building
(Jersey) Law 2002 to enable Members to lodge amendments to the draft Island
Plan, with the appropriate public consultation safeguards, before it is debated
in the States for.