STATES OF JERSEY
r
Early Childhood Education and Care: progress report December 2006
Presented to the States on 22nd December 2006
by the Minister for Education, Sport and Culture
STATES GREFFE
REPORT
FOREWORD
The Council of Ministers’ overall vision is to
enrich the quality of life for Islanders by ensuring that –
·
Jersey
has a unique and recognised identity;
·
people
living here enjoy a good standard of living based on a strong, environmentally
sustainable and prosperous economy;
·
we are
an inclusive society where everyone has equality of opportunity and access to
the services they need;
·
our
environment sustains a sense of well-being;
·
Government
promotes self-sufficiency and enables enterprise.
Whilst the proposals set out in this paper are
primarily about giving our youngest children the best start we can, they are
inextricably linked with this broader economic and social vision. The benefits
of early education and care for the growth and development of children and for
society as a whole are well established. Investment in our youngest is an
intelligent investment in the future.
This progress report provides a structure for
keeping the development of early years under review. Recommendations in respect
of 0-3 year-olds are cautious; understandably so, given the impending
introduction of Income Support and the proposed consultation on parental leave.
With regard to provision for 3-5 year-olds the report highlights some
outstanding features of current arrangements. However, in spite of these, there
remain issues around equity, access and affordability which need to be
resolved.
As Minister for Education, Sport and Culture, I
believe that integrated early education and care should be available for all
children to support their development. With this in mind, I intend to bring
forward to the Council of Ministers, a proposal to provide a free entitlement
of 20 hours per week, 38 weeks per year for all 3 and
4 year-olds. This would be achieved by investing in private sector
provision to complement our nursery classes in provided schools.
However, given the current economic context, I
realise that the timing of this proposal is not ideal. It will need to be
considered against the possible introduction of charges for nursery classes and
means testing. Each of these models has advantages and disadvantages but, in
deciding which to choose, it will be important to ensure that the key
principles underpinning early years policy are preserved; that provision is of
the highest quality and accessible to all.

Senator Mike Vibert
Minister for Education, Sport and Culture
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 The
purpose of this paper is to inform States Members and members of the public
about the progress made to review early years’ provision. The effectiveness of current
arrangements to support parents is considered and recommendations made for
future action.
2. BACKGROUND
2.1 At its meeting of 27th July, the Council of Ministers received a presentation from the Minister for Education, Sport and Culture and a paper prepared by his Department which explored some of the complexities involved in developing a coherent early years strategy. The purpose was to stimulate Ministerial debate about the fundamental principles which might underpin future arrangements.
2.2 Both the presentation and paper focused on provision for children aged 3-5, thus reflecting the scope of R.C.54/2005: ‘Investing in our Future: a vision for early childhood education and care for children in Jersey’. However, it was recognised that such provision was only a sub-set of arrangements for children aged 0-5 and support for their parents/carers, which itself constitutes one element of Social Policy for the Island.
2.3 The outcome of the discussions held by the Council of
Ministers was agreement that the:
‘Education,
Sport and Culture, Employment and Social Security, Health and Social Services
and Treasury and Resources Departments should work together, under the auspices
of the Social Strategy Group to develop an Early Years Strategy for the 0-3
year age range by the end of 2006’
2.4 Consequently,
an officer group was established and tasked to –
·
bring
forward recommendations for a comprehensive strategy for supporting early years
childcare and education in respect of the 0-5 age group;
·
consider
the appropriate arrangements for financial support for the parents and carers
of this age group, including benefits and tax allowances;
·
take
account of the potential impact of proposals on existing provision;
·
ensure
that any recommendations or options for development are fully costed;
·
ensure
that the recommendations balance the interests of private and public sector
provision to create choice as far as possible within an efficient system of
provision;
·
work
within the current strategic and business plan.
3. KEY PRINCIPLES AND OBJECTIVES
3.1 In undertaking the work, the officers have taken account of research findings which suggest that –
(i)
quality
childcare has a beneficial impact on the development of children and this is
enhanced further where provision includes an element of early education. The
benefits to children are sustained into adulthood and garnered by society as a
whole by reducing the costs associated with educational failure and its
consequences;
(ii)
high
quality provision is more likely to develop where there is a strong partnership
between the public and private sector that is founded on a clear partnership
agreement;
(iii)
childcare
supports mothers returning to work thus reducing the loss of their skills to
the economy;
(iv)
childcare
costs can be a barrier to labour force participation, particularly in respect
of women;
(v)
support
for childcare is warranted as an intervention measure aimed at children at risk
because intervention of this nature has substantial economic benefits by
reducing unemployment and crime in later life;
(vi)
skill
shortages emerging in the economy may be mitigated by greater or more flexible
parental participation in the workforce;
(vii)
failure
to address issues to do with the affordability of childcare can lead to an
increase in the use of unregistered childcare.
3.2 Consequently,
in reviewing the current context it has been assumed that policies in respect
of early years should –
·
encourage
the development and use of high quality provision thus maximising the
educational and social benefits to children and the long term economic benefits
to society;
·
encourage
parents to remain in the workforce and ease their return at an appropriate time
which accords with their parental preferences.
3.3 The policy objectives would
therefore be to –
·
ensure
that high quality early education and care is available and affordable for
children 0-5 years;
·
give
parents greater choice in the way their children are cared for in their early
years;
·
provide
targeted support for the most challenged families;
·
establish
a strong and stable partnership between all providers, public and private, to
support the growth and development of early years services.
4. OBJECTIVE 1
4.1 To
ensure that high quality early education and care is available and affordable
children 0-5 years
4.2 Availability
4.3 Table 1[1]
shows the numbers of pre-school children in Jersey in 2006 and Table 21
shows the equivalent number of places available including 235 family
daycare places (child-minders). Although data is not currently available to
provide a breakdown of family daycare places by age, it is known that most
cater for children 0-3 years old.
|
Table 1 –
Pre-school population 2006 by age |
|||||
|
Age |
0-1 |
1-2 |
2-3 |
3-4 |
Total 0-4 |
|
Number of Children |
949 |
963 |
962 |
928 |
3,801 |
|
Table 2 –
Available places for the pre-school population 2006 |
|||||
|
Age |
0-1 |
1-2 |
2-3 |
3-4 |
Total 0-4 |
|
Day Nursery Places |
124 |
98 |
218 |
283 |
723 |
|
Pre-school Places |
|
|
152 |
152 |
304 |
|
Family Day Care |
|
|
|
|
235 |
|
Nursery Class Places |
|
|
|
480 |
480 |
|
Total No. Places
Available |
124 |
98 |
370 |
915 |
1,742 |
4.4 During
school term-time, the supply of places is sufficient to meet the needs of 46%
of the pre-school population. The most incongruent match is in respect of
babies and children aged up to 2 years. Although the indication is that
insufficient places are available for this age range, the extent of the
potential demand is not accurately known. This will be influenced by parental
choice about whether one parent remains home to care for a very young child or
whether both parents choose or need to work. However, whilst some parents may
choose nannies[2],
the high cost of provision for babies may lead others to seek informal or
unregistered care.
4.5 The
best match is in respect of 3 and 4 year-olds with ample provision for 98% of
the cohort but this reduces to 47% during school holiday periods. However,
whilst there many parents who require no more than term-time provision, there
are some indications, based on the demand for play scheme places, that there is
a need to increase availability during school holidays. Again no accurate
statistics are available to indicate more precisely what the demand might be.
4.6 Successful
planning for early years should be based on accurate indicators of demand
including demographics, trends in the use of childcare and parental
preferences. Data in respect of 3-4 year-olds is reasonably comprehensive
although there are still unknowns around after school care and holiday
provision. Data in respect of babies and children under two is less current.
For this reason it recommended that:
4.7 The Department for Education, Sport and
Culture works with the States of Jersey Statistics Unit and the Jersey Child
Care Trust to determine a mechanism for collecting data to establish trends in
the use of childcare, parental preferences and gaps in provision.
4.8 Affordability
4.9 As
highlighted in ‘Investing in Our Future,’
the cost of child care can be a barrier to
workforce participation. A typical full-time nursery place for a child aged
under 2 years now costs £258 per week, in excess of £12,000 per annum.
4.10 For
a child aged over 3 years the average full-time cost per week is now £191,
over £9,000. The cost of family daycare is also high. Based on a survey of
62 respondents, 78% of family daycarers charge in excess of £5 per hour. Twenty seven
percent charge in excess of £6 per hour and 3% in excess of £7 per hour.
|
Table 3 – Hourly Child Care Cost – Day Nurseries[3] |
|||
|
Age |
0-2 Years |
2-4 Years |
3-5 Years |
|
Average |
£5.16 |
£4.62 |
£3.82 |
|
Minimum |
£4.00 |
£4.00 |
£3.45 |
|
Maximum |
£6.18 |
£5.35 |
£4.73 |
|
Table 4 – Hourly Child Care Cost – Pre-schools |
|||
|
Age |
0-2 Years |
2-4 Years |
3-5 Years |
|
Average |
– |
£4.22 |
£3.62 |
|
Minimum |
– |
£4.00 |
£3.11 |
|
Maximum |
– |
£5.00 |
|