STATES OF JERSEY

SECOND INTERIM REPORT OF THE CONSTITUTION REVIEW GROUP
Presented to the States on 27th June 2008
by the Council of Ministers
STATES GREFFE
Second
Interim Report
of the
Constitution
Review Group
Members: Sir Philip Bailhache, Bailiff
of Jersey (Chairman)
William
Bailhache QC, H.M. Attorney-General
Bill
Ogley, Chief Executive
Martin
de Forest-Brown, Director, International Finance
Colin
Powell, Adviser, International Affairs
Mike
Entwistle, International Relations
Secretary: David Filipponi, Chief
Officer, Bailiff’s Chambers
December
2007
CONTENTS
Page
2. DEFENCE
AND INTERNAL SECURITY
Current constitutional divisions of
responsibility between Jersey and the UK
Replacement of the UK’s responsibility
Membership of a defensive alliance
Treaties and other international
agreements
Establishment of a foreign office
4. INTERNAL
CONSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS.
The Judiciary and other
institutions of government
6. OTHER
INTERNAL CONSIDERATIONS
Health, Education and Prison issues
Appendix 1 - Cost of participation
in selected international organisations
Appendix 2 – Summary of overall
costs of independence for Jersey
Appendix 3 – Report of Professor
Jeffrey Jowell QC
Appendix 4 – Comparison of small
jurisdictions
SECOND INTERIM REPORT OF THE CONSTITUTION REVIEW GROUP
1. The Constitution Review Group (“the Group”) was established by a Sub-committee of the Policy and Resources Committee and given terms of reference on 11th July 2005 in the following terms:
“1. To conduct a review and evaluation of the potential advantages and disadvantages for Jersey in seeking independence from the United Kingdom or other incremental change in the constitutional relationship, while retaining the Queen as Head of State.
2. To identify:
(a) the practical and economic costs and benefits of dependence;
(b) the practical and economic costs and benefits of independence;
(c) the consequences of independence in terms of Jersey’s relationships with other countries, as well as the UK, and international organisations, particularly the EU, UN, WTO, OECD, and Commonwealth;
(d) the social and cultural consequences of independence.
3. To outline the requirements and processes that would be involved in a transition to independence.
4. To submit to the Chief Minister, by March 2006, a draft Public Consultation Document (“Green Paper”) which outlines the factual information and objectively evaluates the implications of independence.”
2. The Chief Minister extended that time frame and on 19th December 2006 an Interim Report was submitted to the Constitutional Advisory Panel appointed by the Council of Ministers. The report identified two separate stages in fulfilli